2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1955 Riley RM A
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Riley RM A. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Riley RM A would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 642 kg more than 1955 Riley RM A.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1955 Riley RM A. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chrysler Aspen has automatic transmission and 1955 Riley RM A has manual transmission. 1955 Riley RM A will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Aspen will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1955 Riley RM A | |
| Make | Chrysler | Riley |
| Model | Aspen | RM A |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1955 |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1496 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1236 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4560 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1550 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2870 mm |
