2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1961 Ford Thunderbird
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 48 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1961 Ford Thunderbird would be higher. At 6,638 cc (8 cylinders), 1961 Ford Thunderbird is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1961 Ford Thunderbird (339 HP @ 4800 RPM) has 36 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1961 Ford Thunderbird should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1961 Ford Thunderbird weights approximately 60 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1961 Ford Thunderbird. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1961 Ford Thunderbird | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Thunderbird |
Year Released | 2009 | 1961 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 6638 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 303 HP | 339 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4800 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1815 kg | 1875 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5110 mm | 5210 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1930 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1340 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2880 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 50 L |