2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1962 Morris Minor
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Morris Minor. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Morris Minor would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 263 more horse power than 1962 Morris Minor. (36 HP @ 4750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1962 Morris Minor.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 262 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Morris Minor. (68 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Morris Minor.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1962 Morris Minor | |
Make | Chrysler | Morris |
Model | Aspen | Minor |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 948 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 36 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4750 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 68 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3770 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1560 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2190 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 45 L |