2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1962 Skoda 1202
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Skoda 1202. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Skoda 1202 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 255 more horse power than 1962 Skoda 1202. (44 HP @ 4200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 243 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Skoda 1202. (87 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Skoda 1202.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1962 Skoda 1202 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Skoda |
| Model | Aspen | 1202 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1221 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 299 HP | 44 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4200 RPM |
| Torque | 330 Nm | 87 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4490 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1590 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2690 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 30 L |
