2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 302 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 800 kg more than 1963 DKW Munga. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | Aspen | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 31 L |