2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1963 DKW Munga
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 DKW Munga. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 DKW Munga would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 256 more horse power than 1963 DKW Munga. (43 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1963 DKW Munga.
Because 1963 DKW Munga is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1963 DKW Munga will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1963 DKW Munga | |
Make | Chrysler | DKW |
Model | Aspen | Munga |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 980 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 43 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3450 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1820 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1760 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2010 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 31 L |