2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1964 MG 1100
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 45 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1964 MG 1100. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1964 MG 1100 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 246 more horse power than 1964 MG 1100. (53 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1964 MG 1100.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1964 MG 1100, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 247 more torque (in Nm) than 1964 MG 1100. (83 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1964 MG 1100.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1964 MG 1100 | |
Make | Chrysler | MG |
Model | Aspen | 1100 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1964 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1098 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 53 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5500 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 83 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3730 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1540 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2380 mm |