2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1965 Renault 8
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 44 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1965 Renault 8. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1965 Renault 8 would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 298 more horse power than 1965 Renault 8. (47 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1965 Renault 8. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 1170 kg more than 1965 Renault 8. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1965 Renault 8. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1965 Renault 8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Aspen | 8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1965 |
Engine Position | Front | Rear |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 955 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 740 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4000 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1500 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1370 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2280 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 38 L |