2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1968 Jaguar E Type
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 41 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1968 Jaguar E Type. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1968 Jaguar E Type would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 73 more horse power than 1968 Jaguar E Type. (226 HP @ 5400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1968 Jaguar E Type.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1968 Jaguar E Type | |
| Make | Chrysler | Jaguar |
| Model | Aspen | E Type |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1968 |
| Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 4701 cc | 4235 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 299 HP | 226 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5400 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4460 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1640 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1190 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2450 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 63 L |
