2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1970 Ford Falcon
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 39 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1970 Ford Falcon. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1970 Ford Falcon would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 144 more horse power than 1970 Ford Falcon. (155 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 4 more torque (in Nm) than 1970 Ford Falcon. (326 Nm @ 1600 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1970 Ford Falcon.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1970 Ford Falcon | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Falcon |
Year Released | 2009 | 1970 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 4093 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 155 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 326 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 1600 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.3:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4690 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1870 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1430 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2830 mm |