2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1975 Renault 4
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 34 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1975 Renault 4. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1975 Renault 4 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 265 more horse power than 1975 Renault 4. (34 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1975 Renault 4.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1975 Renault 4, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 1975 Renault 4. (58 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1975 Renault 4. 2009 Chrysler Aspen has automatic transmission and 1975 Renault 4 has manual transmission. 1975 Renault 4 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Aspen will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1975 Renault 4 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Aspen | 4 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1975 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 845 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 34 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 8.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1560 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2410 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 38 L |