2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1980 TVR 3000
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 29 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1980 TVR 3000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1980 TVR 3000 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 858 kg more than 1980 TVR 3000.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1980 TVR 3000. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. 2009 Chrysler Aspen has automatic transmission and 1980 TVR 3000 has manual transmission. 1980 TVR 3000 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Aspen will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1980 TVR 3000 | |
Make | Chrysler | TVR |
Model | Aspen | 3000 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1980 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2994 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1020 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 3940 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1120 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2290 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 58 L |