2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1981 Zastava 750

To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 28 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1981 Zastava 750. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1981 Zastava 750 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (303 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 270 more horse power than 1981 Zastava 750. (33 HP @ 4600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1981 Zastava 750. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 1175 kg more than 1981 Zastava 750. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 1981 Zastava 750. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (447 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 392 more torque (in Nm) than 1981 Zastava 750. (55 Nm @ 2500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1981 Zastava 750. 2009 Chrysler Aspen has automatic transmission and 1981 Zastava 750 has manual transmission. 1981 Zastava 750 will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Aspen will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.

Compare all specifications: