2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1982 Renault 9
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Renault 9. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Renault 9 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 252 more horse power than 1982 Renault 9. (47 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1982 Renault 9.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1982 Renault 9, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1982 Renault 9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Renault |
Model | Aspen | 9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1108 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 47 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5250 RPM |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 2500 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.2:1 |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4070 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1660 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1410 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2610 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 38 L |