2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1982 Volvo 360
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 27 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1982 Volvo 360. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1982 Volvo 360 would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 239 more horse power than 1982 Volvo 360. (101 HP @ 5700 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1982 Volvo 360. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 778 kg more than 1982 Volvo 360. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (380 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 217 more torque (in Nm) than 1982 Volvo 360. (163 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1982 Volvo 360.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1982 Volvo 360 | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Aspen | 360 |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1982 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1986 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 101 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 5700 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 163 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3300 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1100 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4310 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1670 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1400 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2410 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 58 L |
