2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 1997 Honda Integra
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 Honda Integra. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 Honda Integra would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP) has 123 more horse power than 1997 Honda Integra. (176 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 1997 Honda Integra.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1997 Honda Integra, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 1997 Honda Integra | |
Make | Chrysler | Honda |
Model | Aspen | Integra |
Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1834 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 176 HP |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 3 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4380 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1710 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1290 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2570 mm |