2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 9 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2000 Mitsubishi SSU would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 221 more horse power than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (119 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2000 Mitsubishi SSU weights approximately 27 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (380 Nm) has 140 more torque (in Nm) than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2000 Mitsubishi SSU.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2000 Mitsubishi SSU | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Aspen | SSU |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2000 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 5654 cc | 2500 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 119 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 4000 RPM |
| Torque | 380 Nm | 240 Nm |
| Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
| Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1905 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2570 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 71 L |
