2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2002 Mitsubishi SUP
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Mitsubishi SUP would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 136 more horse power than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (163 HP @ 4000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2009 Chrysler Aspen. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2002 Mitsubishi SUP, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm) has 90 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Mitsubishi SUP.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2002 Mitsubishi SUP | |
Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
Model | Aspen | SUP |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 1999 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 163 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 240 Nm |
Drive Type | Rear | Front |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1860 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2620 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 90 L |