2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2003 Subaru R2
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 6 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2003 Subaru R2. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2003 Subaru R2 would be higher. At 4,701 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) has 254 more horse power than 2003 Subaru R2. (45 HP @ 6000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2003 Subaru R2.
Because 2003 Subaru R2 is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2003 Subaru R2 will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM) has 272 more torque (in Nm) than 2003 Subaru R2. (58 Nm @ 5200 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2003 Subaru R2.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2003 Subaru R2 | |
Make | Chrysler | Subaru |
Model | Aspen | R2 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2003 |
Body Type | SUV | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 658 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 45 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 58 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 10.5:1 |
Drive Type | Rear | 4WD |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 3400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2370 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 30 L |