2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (340 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 35 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 510 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 142 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (380 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Aspen | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 380 Nm | 522 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 2388 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 12.4 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 18.1 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 106 L |