2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2005 Toyota 4Runner
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 5,653 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (345 HP @ 5300 RPM) has 75 more horse power than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (270 HP @ 3400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen should accelerate faster than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Toyota 4Runner weights approximately 43 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (515 Nm) has 81 more torque (in Nm) than 2005 Toyota 4Runner. (434 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2005 Toyota 4Runner.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2005 Toyota 4Runner | |
Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
Model | Aspen | 4Runner |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | SUV | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5653 cc | 4671 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 345 HP | 270 HP |
Engine RPM | 5300 RPM | 3400 RPM |
Torque | 515 Nm | 434 Nm |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1910 kg | 1953 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4830 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1880 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1830 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2830 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 11.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 14.9 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.4 L/100km | 13.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 87 L |