2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2008 Ford Territory
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Ford Territory. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Ford Territory would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2008 Ford Territory weights approximately 137 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Both vehicles are four wheel drive (4WD) - it offers better handling, traction, and control in all driving conditions compared with front wheel drive or rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, both vehicles can yield 380 Nm of torque. So under normal driving conditions, the ability to climb up hills and pull heavy equipment should be relatively similar for both vehicles.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2008 Ford Territory | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Aspen | Territory |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Crossover |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 3984 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 380 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3250 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | 4WD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 2015 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 5770 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1730 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2850 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 13.5 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 76 L |