2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2008 Mercedes-Benz C
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Aspen is newer by 1 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2008 Mercedes-Benz C would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 378 kg more than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Aspen (380 Nm @ 4200 RPM) has 120 more torque (in Nm) than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C. (260 Nm @ 3500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Aspen will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2008 Mercedes-Benz C.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2008 Mercedes-Benz C | |
Make | Chrysler | Mercedes-Benz |
Model | Aspen | C |
Year Released | 2009 | 2008 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 1796 cc |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 260 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 3500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
Drive Type | 4WD | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1500 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4630 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1450 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2720 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 12.3 L/100km | 9.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 62 L |