2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2012 Audi R8
To start off, 2012 Audi R8 is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. At 5,654 cc (8 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Aspen is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2012 Audi R8 (420 HP) has 80 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (340 HP) In normal driving conditions, 2012 Audi R8 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2012 Audi R8 (430 Nm @ 4500 RPM) has 50 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (380 Nm @ 4200 RPM). This means 2012 Audi R8 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2012 Audi R8 | |
Make | Chrysler | Audi |
Model | Aspen | R8 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
Body Type | SUV | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Middle |
Engine Size | 5654 cc | 4200 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 340 HP | 420 HP |
Torque | 380 Nm | 430 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4200 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline - Premium |
Drive Type | 4WD | AWD |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automated manual |
Number of Seats | 8 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4435 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1905 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1245 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2649 mm |
Fuel Consumption | 11.8 L/100km | 11.8 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 21.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 90 L |