2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2012 Opel Ampera
To start off, 2012 Opel Ampera is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Aspen weights approximately 163 kg more than 2012 Opel Ampera.
Because 2009 Chrysler Aspen is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2012 Opel Ampera. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Aspen will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2012 Opel Ampera | |
| Make | Chrysler | Opel |
| Model | Aspen | Ampera |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2012 |
| Body Type | SUV | Sedan |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Horse Power | 340 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline / Electric Hybrid | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | 4WD | Front |
| Transmission Type | Automatic | Single Speed |
| Number of Seats | 8 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1878 kg | 1715 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5140 mm | 4498 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 1788 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1880 mm | 1438 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2685 mm |
| Fuel Consumption Highway | 11.8 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption City | 12.4 L/100km | 2.5 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 102 L | 35 L |
