2009 Chrysler Aspen vs. 2013 Aston Martin DB9
To start off, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Aspen. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Aspen would be higher. At 5,900 cc (12 cylinders), 2013 Aston Martin DB9 is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (470 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 171 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (299 HP @ 5650 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2013 Aston Martin DB9 (601 Nm @ 6000 RPM) has 271 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Aspen. (330 Nm @ 3950 RPM). This means 2013 Aston Martin DB9 will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Aspen.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Aspen | 2013 Aston Martin DB9 | |
Make | Chrysler | Aston Martin |
Model | Aspen | DB9 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2013 |
Body Type | SUV | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 4701 cc | 5900 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 8 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 2 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 299 HP | 470 HP |
Engine RPM | 5650 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 330 Nm | 601 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3950 RPM | 6000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Premium |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | 6-speed automatic |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 4290 mm | 4710 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1940 mm | 2017 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1890 mm | 1270 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3030 mm | 2745 mm |
Fuel Consumption Highway | 12.4 L/100km | 11.7 L/100km |
Fuel Consumption City | 16.8 L/100km | 18.9 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 57 L | 80 L |