2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1955 Ford 12 M

To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 54 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1955 Ford 12 M. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1955 Ford 12 M would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 179 more horse power than 1955 Ford 12 M. (37 HP @ 4250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1955 Ford 12 M.

Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chrysler Crossfire 1955 Ford 12 M
Make Chrysler Ford
Model Crossfire 12 M
Year Released 2009 1955
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3199 cc 1172 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Valves per Cylinder 3 valves 2 valves
Horse Power 216 HP 37 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 4250 RPM
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Drive Type Rear Rear
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4070 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1590 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1560 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2500 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]