2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1962 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 47 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1962 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1962 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 156 more horse power than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (60 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1962 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 533 kg more than 1962 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 195 more torque (in Nm) than 1962 Nissan Cedric. (115 Nm @ 3200 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1962 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1962 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1962 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1488 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 216 HP | 60 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 115 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3200 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 930 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 4420 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1690 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1530 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2540 mm |