2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1963 Lotus Elite
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lotus Elite. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lotus Elite would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 132 more horse power than 1963 Lotus Elite. (83 HP @ 6400 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1963 Lotus Elite. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1455 kg more than 1963 Lotus Elite. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1963 Lotus Elite | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Crossfire | Elite |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Convertible | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 1216 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 83 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6400 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 580 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3670 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1480 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1180 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 29 L |