2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1963 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 312 more horse power than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (18 HP @ 5500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 1030 kg more than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm @ 3500 RPM) has 388 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Suzuki Fronte. (32 Nm @ 3700 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1963 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossfire | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
| Engine Size | 3197 cc | 358 cc |
| Horse Power | 330 HP | 18 HP |
| Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 5500 RPM |
| Torque | 420 Nm | 32 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3500 RPM | 3700 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Vehicle Weight | 1530 kg | 500 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1300 mm | 1390 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2060 mm |
