2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1963 Triumph 2000

To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Triumph 2000. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Triumph 2000 would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 127 more horse power than 1963 Triumph 2000. (89 HP @ 5000 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1963 Triumph 2000. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 293 kg more than 1963 Triumph 2000. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 152 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Triumph 2000. (158 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Triumph 2000.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chrysler Crossfire 1963 Triumph 2000
Make Chrysler Triumph
Model Crossfire 2000
Year Released 2009 1963
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 3199 cc 1998 cc
Engine Cylinders 6 cylinders 6 cylinders
Engine Type V in-line
Horse Power 216 HP 89 HP
Engine RPM 5700 RPM 5000 RPM
Torque 310 Nm 158 Nm
Torque RPM 3000 RPM 3000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 89.3 mm 74.8 mm
Engine Stroke Size 84 mm 76 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 10.0:1 9.3:1
Fuel Type Gasoline - Premium Gasoline
Number of Seats 2 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 2 doors 4 doors
Vehicle Weight 1463 kg 1170 kg
Vehicle Length 4070 mm 4420 mm
Vehicle Width 1770 mm 1660 mm
Vehicle Height 1310 mm 1430 mm
Wheelbase Size 2700 mm 2700 mm
Fuel Tank Capacity 60 L 64 L