2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1972 Nissan Cedric
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 37 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1972 Nissan Cedric. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1972 Nissan Cedric would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 97 more horse power than 1972 Nissan Cedric. (118 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1972 Nissan Cedric. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 715 kg more than 1972 Nissan Cedric. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 1972 Nissan Cedric. (216 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1972 Nissan Cedric.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1972 Nissan Cedric | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Cedric |
Year Released | 2009 | 1972 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 2565 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | in-line |
Horse Power | 215 HP | 118 HP |
Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 310 Nm | 216 Nm |
Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Gasoline | Gasoline |
Vehicle Weight | 2035 kg | 1320 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 4700 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1700 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1320 mm | 1460 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 2700 mm |