2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1976 Suzuki Fronte
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 33 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1976 Suzuki Fronte. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1976 Suzuki Fronte would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP @ 5700 RPM) has 183 more horse power than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (33 HP @ 6500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 983 kg more than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (310 Nm @ 3000 RPM) has 268 more torque (in Nm) than 1976 Suzuki Fronte. (42 Nm @ 4500 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1976 Suzuki Fronte.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1976 Suzuki Fronte | |
| Make | Chrysler | Suzuki |
| Model | Crossfire | Fronte |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1976 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 356 cc |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 33 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 6500 RPM |
| Torque | 310 Nm | 42 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 4500 RPM |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 3 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 480 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 3000 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1300 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1210 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2700 mm | 2020 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 30 L |
