2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 1997 MCC Smart
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 12 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1997 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1997 MCC Smart would be higher. At 3,199 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (216 HP) has 163 more horse power than 1997 MCC Smart. (53 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 1997 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire weights approximately 813 kg more than 1997 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 1997 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Crossfire | Smart |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1997 |
| Body Type | Coupe | Coupe |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 599 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | in-line |
| Horse Power | 216 HP | 53 HP |
| Top Speed | 250 km/hour | 129 km/hour |
| Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 1463 kg | 650 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 4070 mm | 2510 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1460 mm |
