2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2005 Nissan Armada
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 4 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2005 Nissan Armada. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2005 Nissan Armada would be higher. At 5,556 cc (8 cylinders), 2005 Nissan Armada is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP @ 6100 RPM) has 25 more horse power than 2005 Nissan Armada. (305 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2005 Nissan Armada. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2005 Nissan Armada weights approximately 772 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2005 Nissan Armada (522 Nm) has 102 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. (420 Nm). This means 2005 Nissan Armada will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 2005 Nissan Armada | |
Make | Chrysler | Nissan |
Model | Crossfire | Armada |
Year Released | 2009 | 2005 |
Body Type | Convertible | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3199 cc | 5556 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 3 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 305 HP |
Engine RPM | 6100 RPM | 3600 RPM |
Torque | 420 Nm | 522 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 89.9 mm | 98.1 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 84 mm | 92 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 9.0:1 | 9.8:1 |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 8 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1572 kg | 2344 kg |
Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5260 mm |
Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 2010 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1980 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3140 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 15.7 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 106 L |