2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2006 Mitsubishi Raider
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is newer by 3 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2006 Mitsubishi Raider. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2006 Mitsubishi Raider would be higher. At 4,703 cc (8 cylinders), 2006 Mitsubishi Raider is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (230 HP @ 4600 RPM) has 15 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. (215 HP @ 5700 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Let's talk about torque, 2006 Mitsubishi Raider (393 Nm @ 3600 RPM) has 82 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. (311 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2006 Mitsubishi Raider will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Crossfire.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 2006 Mitsubishi Raider | |
| Make | Chrysler | Mitsubishi |
| Model | Crossfire | Raider |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2006 |
| Body Type | Convertible | Pickup |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 3199 cc | 4703 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
| Engine Type | V | V |
| Horse Power | 215 HP | 230 HP |
| Engine RPM | 5700 RPM | 4600 RPM |
| Torque | 311 Nm | 393 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 3000 RPM | 3600 RPM |
| Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
| Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Length | 4060 mm | 5590 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 1770 mm | 1830 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1310 mm | 1750 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 2410 mm | 3340 mm |
| Fuel Consumption City | 13.8 L/100km | 15.8 L/100km |
| Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.4 L/100km | 14 L/100km |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 60 L | 83 L |
