2009 Chrysler Crossfire vs. 2011 Holden Commodore
To start off, 2011 Holden Commodore is newer by 2 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2009 Chrysler Crossfire. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2009 Chrysler Crossfire would be higher. At 3,197 cc (6 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Crossfire is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (330 HP) has 90 more horse power than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire should accelerate faster than 2011 Holden Commodore.
Both vehicles are rear wheel drive (RWD) - it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, both vehicles do the job better than front wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Crossfire (420 Nm) has 180 more torque (in Nm) than 2011 Holden Commodore. (240 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2011 Holden Commodore. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire has automatic transmission and 2011 Holden Commodore has manual transmission. 2011 Holden Commodore will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2009 Chrysler Crossfire will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Crossfire | 2011 Holden Commodore | |
Make | Chrysler | Holden |
Model | Crossfire | Commodore |
Year Released | 2009 | 2011 |
Body Type | Coupe | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 3197 cc | 2564 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 6 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | V | V |
Horse Power | 330 HP | 240 HP |
Torque | 420 Nm | 240 Nm |
Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Rear | Rear |
Transmission Type | Automatic | Manual |
Number of Seats | 2 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 2 doors | 4 doors |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 11 L/100km | 10.9 L/100km |