2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 57 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn would be higher. At 4,255 cc (6 cylinders), 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 230 kg more than 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn.
Because 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1952 Rolls-Royce Silver Dawn | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Voyager | Silver Dawn |
Year Released | 2009 | 1952 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 4255 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 7 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1830 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5170 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1760 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1680 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3050 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 108 L |