2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1953 Maserati A6GCM
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 56 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1953 Maserati A6GCM. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1953 Maserati A6GCM would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 1953 Maserati A6GCM (194 HP @ 8000 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 1953 Maserati A6GCM should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1490 kg more than 1953 Maserati A6GCM.
Because 1953 Maserati A6GCM is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1953 Maserati A6GCM. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1953 Maserati A6GCM | |
Make | Chrysler | Maserati |
Model | Grand Voyager | A6GCM |
Year Released | 2009 | 1953 |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1959 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 194 HP |
Engine RPM | 4000 RPM | 8000 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 570 kg |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2290 mm |