2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 50 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud would be higher. At 6,230 cc (8 cylinders), 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud weights approximately 48 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager.
Because 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1959 Rolls-Royce Silver Cloud | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Voyager | Silver Cloud |
Year Released | 2009 | 1959 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 6230 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 8 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 0 HP |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 2108 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5490 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1910 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1630 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 15.2 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 81 L |