2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1960 Lotus Seven
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 49 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1960 Lotus Seven. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1960 Lotus Seven would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 110 more horse power than 1960 Lotus Seven. (38 HP @ 4500 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1960 Lotus Seven.
Because 1960 Lotus Seven is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1960 Lotus Seven. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1960 Lotus Seven | |
Make | Chrysler | Lotus |
Model | Grand Voyager | Seven |
Year Released | 2009 | 1960 |
Body Type | Minivan | Roadster |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1172 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 38 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4500 RPM |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3360 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1490 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1100 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2240 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 29 L |