2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1963 Lancia Flavia
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 46 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1963 Lancia Flavia. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1963 Lancia Flavia would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (145 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 54 more horse power than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (91 HP @ 5200 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1963 Lancia Flavia. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 825 kg more than 1963 Lancia Flavia. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (218 Nm @ 4000 RPM) has 72 more torque (in Nm) than 1963 Lancia Flavia. (146 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1963 Lancia Flavia.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1963 Lancia Flavia | |
Make | Chrysler | Lancia |
Model | Grand Voyager | Flavia |
Year Released | 2009 | 1963 |
Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1799 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | boxer |
Horse Power | 145 HP | 91 HP |
Engine RPM | 5200 RPM | 5200 RPM |
Torque | 218 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 4000 RPM | 3000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 87.6 mm | 88 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 101 mm | 74 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 10.0:1 | 9.0:1 |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 1935 kg | 1110 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4350 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1380 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2490 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 10.1 L/100km | 10.1 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 48 L |