2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1990 Toyota Lite Ace
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 19 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1990 Toyota Lite Ace would be higher. At 2,429 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 831 kg more than 1990 Toyota Lite Ace.
Because 1990 Toyota Lite Ace is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 1990 Toyota Lite Ace. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 1990 Toyota Lite Ace | |
| Make | Chrysler | Toyota |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Lite Ace |
| Year Released | 2009 | 1990 |
| Engine Size | 2429 cc | 1453 cc |
| Horse Power | 145 HP | 0 HP |
| Fuel Type | Gasoline - Premium | Gasoline |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Vehicle Weight | 1935 kg | 1104 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4010 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1660 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1910 mm |
