2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 1996 Toyota 4Runner

To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 13 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 1996 Toyota 4Runner. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 1996 Toyota 4Runner would be higher. At 2,982 cc (4 cylinders), 1996 Toyota 4Runner is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (140 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 17 more horse power than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (123 HP @ 3600 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 210 kg more than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.

Because 1996 Toyota 4Runner is four wheel drive (4WD), it will have significant more traction and grip than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. In wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 1996 Toyota 4Runner will offer significantly more control. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 25 more torque (in Nm) than 1996 Toyota 4Runner. (295 Nm @ 2000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 1996 Toyota 4Runner.

Compare all specifications:

2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager 1996 Toyota 4Runner
Make Chrysler Toyota
Model Grand Voyager 4Runner
Year Released 2009 1996
Body Type Minivan SUV
Engine Position Front Front
Engine Size 2497 cc 2982 cc
Engine Cylinders 4 cylinders 4 cylinders
Engine Type in-line in-line
Horse Power 140 HP 123 HP
Engine RPM 4000 RPM 3600 RPM
Torque 320 Nm 295 Nm
Torque RPM 2000 RPM 2000 RPM
Engine Bore Size 92 mm 96 mm
Engine Stroke Size 94 mm 103 mm
Engine Compression Ratio 18.0:1 21.2:1
Fuel Type Diesel Diesel
Drive Type Front 4WD
Transmission Type Manual Manual
Number of Seats 7 seats 5 seats
Number of Doors 5 doors 5 doors
Vehicle Weight 2060 kg 1850 kg
Vehicle Width 2000 mm 1700 mm


 

More Comparisons

Resources

Replacing Your Front Disc Brakes Made Simple: The Definitive DIY Guide
Replace the front disc brakes of your vehicle and save money on labour cost. Read this guide to learn how. [read more]
What to look for when buying a used/second hand car.
Diligence through every step of the buying process will help you find a reliable used car and avoid any unpleasant surprises. [read more]
Step-by-Step Guide on How to Perform an Oil Change on Your Car
One of the most effective ways of saving money on car maintenance is to change the oil yourself. [read more]