2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph would be higher. At 5,377 cc (12 cylinders), 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (318 HP @ 5000 RPM) has 170 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph weights approximately 240 kg more than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph (489 Nm @ 3900 RPM) has 129 more torque (in Nm) than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM). This means 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph has automatic transmission and 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Rolls-Royce Silver Seraph | |
Make | Chrysler | Rolls-Royce |
Model | Grand Voyager | Silver Seraph |
Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
Body Type | Minivan | Sedan |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 5377 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 12 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 318 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 489 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3900 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 85 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 79 mm |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Rear |
Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 2300 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 5400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1940 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1520 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 3070 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 94 L |