2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2001 Volvo SCC
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 8 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2001 Volvo SCC. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2001 Volvo SCC would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2001 Volvo SCC (208 HP @ 5200 RPM) has 60 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2001 Volvo SCC should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 609 kg more than 2001 Volvo SCC.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm) has 75 more torque (in Nm) than 2001 Volvo SCC. (285 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2001 Volvo SCC. 2001 Volvo SCC has automatic transmission and 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager has manual transmission. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will offer better control over acceleration and deceleration in addition to better fuel efficiency overall. 2001 Volvo SCC will be easier to drive especially in heavy traffic.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2001 Volvo SCC | |
| Make | Chrysler | Volvo |
| Model | Grand Voyager | SCC |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2001 |
| Engine Position | Front | Front |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2521 cc |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 208 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5200 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 285 Nm |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Automatic |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 4 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1451 kg |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2720 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 70 L |
