2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2002 Citroen C3
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Citroen C3. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Citroen C3 would be higher. At 2,497 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (140 HP) has 68 more horse power than 2002 Citroen C3. (72 HP). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2002 Citroen C3. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 980 kg more than 2002 Citroen C3. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (320 Nm @ 2000 RPM) has 202 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Citroen C3. (118 Nm @ 3300 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Citroen C3.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2002 Citroen C3 | |
Make | Chrysler | Citroen |
Model | Grand Voyager | C3 |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | Hatchback |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2497 cc | 1358 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 2 valves |
Horse Power | 140 HP | 72 HP |
Torque | 320 Nm | 118 Nm |
Torque RPM | 2000 RPM | 3300 RPM |
Engine Compression Ratio | 18.0:1 | 10.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline - Premium |
Acceleration 0-100mph | 13.1 seconds | 14.2 seconds |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1080 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3860 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1670 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1540 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2470 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 7.7 L/100km | 6.3 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |