2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2002 Ford Puma
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 Ford Puma. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 Ford Puma would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 48 more horse power than 2002 Ford Puma. (100 HP @ 5750 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2002 Ford Puma. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1025 kg more than 2002 Ford Puma. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Both vehicles are front wheel drive (FWD). Which offers better traction when its slippery than rear wheel drive vehicles. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 214 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 Ford Puma. (146 Nm @ 4000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 Ford Puma.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2002 Ford Puma | |
Make | Chrysler | Ford |
Model | Grand Voyager | Puma |
Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
Body Type | Minivan | Coupe |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 1560 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 4 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 100 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5750 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 146 Nm |
Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 79 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 81.4 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 11.0:1 |
Fuel Type | Diesel | Gasoline |
Drive Type | Front | Front |
Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 4 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1035 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4020 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1680 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1350 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2450 mm |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 45 L |