2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2002 MCC Smart
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 7 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2002 MCC Smart. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2002 MCC Smart would be higher. At 2,776 cc (4 cylinders), 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) has 68 more horse power than 2002 MCC Smart. (80 HP @ 5250 RPM). In normal driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager should accelerate faster than 2002 MCC Smart. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 1244 kg more than 2002 MCC Smart. So despite on having greater horse power, its additional weight may have an impact towards its acceleration in comparison.
Because 2002 MCC Smart is rear wheel drive (RWD), it offers better handling in dry conditions; in addition, if you are looking to drift, it will be much easier to do with 2002 MCC Smart. However, in wet, icy, snow, or gravel driving conditions, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager, being front wheel drive (FWD), will offer much better control with better grip. With that said, do keep in mind that many other factors such as speed and the wear on your tires can also have significant impact on traction and control. Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm @ 1800 RPM) has 250 more torque (in Nm) than 2002 MCC Smart. (110 Nm @ 3000 RPM). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2002 MCC Smart.
Compare all specifications:
| 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2002 MCC Smart | |
| Make | Chrysler | MCC |
| Model | Grand Voyager | Smart |
| Year Released | 2009 | 2002 |
| Body Type | Minivan | Convertible |
| Engine Position | Front | Rear |
| Engine Size | 2776 cc | 698 cc |
| Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 3 cylinders |
| Engine Type | in-line | in-line |
| Horse Power | 148 HP | 80 HP |
| Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 5250 RPM |
| Torque | 360 Nm | 110 Nm |
| Torque RPM | 1800 RPM | 3000 RPM |
| Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 66.5 mm |
| Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 67 mm |
| Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 9.0:1 |
| Acceleration 0-100mph | 11.9 seconds | 11.2 seconds |
| Drive Type | Front | Rear |
| Transmission Type | Manual | Manual |
| Number of Seats | 7 seats | 2 seats |
| Number of Doors | 5 doors | 2 doors |
| Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 816 kg |
| Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 3430 mm |
| Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1620 mm |
| Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1200 mm |
| Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2370 mm |
| Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 35 L |
