2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager vs. 2004 Mazda Tribute
To start off, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager is newer by 5 year(s). Which means there will be less support and parts availability for 2004 Mazda Tribute. In addition, the cost of maintenance, including insurance, on 2004 Mazda Tribute would be higher. At 2,966 cc (6 cylinders), 2004 Mazda Tribute is equipped with a bigger engine. In terms of performance, 2004 Mazda Tribute (201 HP @ 4000 RPM) has 53 more horse power than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. (148 HP @ 3800 RPM) In normal driving conditions, 2004 Mazda Tribute should accelerate faster than 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager. With that said, vehicle weight also plays an important factor in acceleration. 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager weights approximately 554 kg more than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Let's talk about torque, 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager (360 Nm) has 94 more torque (in Nm) than 2004 Mazda Tribute. (266 Nm). This means 2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager will have an easier job in driving up hills or pulling heavy equipment than 2004 Mazda Tribute.
Compare all specifications:
2009 Chrysler Grand Voyager | 2004 Mazda Tribute | |
Make | Chrysler | Mazda |
Model | Grand Voyager | Tribute |
Year Released | 2009 | 2004 |
Body Type | Minivan | SUV |
Engine Position | Front | Front |
Engine Size | 2776 cc | 2966 cc |
Engine Cylinders | 4 cylinders | 6 cylinders |
Engine Type | in-line | V |
Valves per Cylinder | 4 valves | 4 valves |
Horse Power | 148 HP | 201 HP |
Engine RPM | 3800 RPM | 4000 RPM |
Torque | 360 Nm | 266 Nm |
Engine Bore Size | 94.1 mm | 89 mm |
Engine Stroke Size | 100 mm | 80 mm |
Engine Compression Ratio | 17.5:1 | 10.0:1 |
Number of Seats | 7 seats | 5 seats |
Number of Doors | 5 doors | 5 doors |
Vehicle Weight | 2060 kg | 1506 kg |
Vehicle Length | 5100 mm | 4400 mm |
Vehicle Width | 2000 mm | 1830 mm |
Vehicle Height | 1760 mm | 1780 mm |
Wheelbase Size | 3040 mm | 2630 mm |
Fuel Consumption Overall | 8.5 L/100km | 11.4 L/100km |
Fuel Tank Capacity | 75 L | 62 L |